No problem.
Merely one set of ideas and opinions out of all the humans who exist and have existed.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Understanding the Conflict in Afghanistan
If you want to comprehend what exactly is going on, simply reference this crystal clear Powerpoint slide which was presented to military commanders.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Wage at the Minimum
I am a minimum wage guy. Well, almost. I get 10 cents more per hour ($7.35) than the federal minimum wage requires.
The default opinion on minimum wage laws seems to be Higher! One major reason being for those who are supporting children, single parent homes especially. Also the mystically defined "living wage."
Every so often I think about the mandated minimum wage and it makes my stomach turn a little. There are faulty, yet well intentioned lines of thought wrapped up in the issue.
The first one I think of is why stop at $7.25 an hour? If we want people to have full lives with all opportunities available to them, let's hike it up to $50 or $100 an hour. I feel it would be difficult to find someone who believes that would work out well for more than a month. Companies cannot pay that much. So why think they can pay $7.25 an hour or any other "low" rate? How many firms close because of this unaffordable price control? It merely creates shortages, nothing else.
Allowing companies to pay a rate they determine to be affordable would not be a bad thing. Entry level jobs would be more plentiful, there would be more firms thus increasing competition, not only in product or service pricing but in wages as well, which would be beneficial for workers. Benefits would increase as well.
It's an issue that is easily sold to voters by politicians because of its assumed value, thus making it popular to say one is for raising the minimum wage.
The default opinion on minimum wage laws seems to be Higher! One major reason being for those who are supporting children, single parent homes especially. Also the mystically defined "living wage."
Every so often I think about the mandated minimum wage and it makes my stomach turn a little. There are faulty, yet well intentioned lines of thought wrapped up in the issue.
The first one I think of is why stop at $7.25 an hour? If we want people to have full lives with all opportunities available to them, let's hike it up to $50 or $100 an hour. I feel it would be difficult to find someone who believes that would work out well for more than a month. Companies cannot pay that much. So why think they can pay $7.25 an hour or any other "low" rate? How many firms close because of this unaffordable price control? It merely creates shortages, nothing else.
Allowing companies to pay a rate they determine to be affordable would not be a bad thing. Entry level jobs would be more plentiful, there would be more firms thus increasing competition, not only in product or service pricing but in wages as well, which would be beneficial for workers. Benefits would increase as well.
It's an issue that is easily sold to voters by politicians because of its assumed value, thus making it popular to say one is for raising the minimum wage.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
It's Been Too Long
Internet may be back for me. The verdict is still coming...
Thought this was a fun little article: Zimbabwe, Iran and North Korea a little triangle of friends. It looks like the global version of the uncool kids club.
Thought this was a fun little article: Zimbabwe, Iran and North Korea a little triangle of friends. It looks like the global version of the uncool kids club.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Obama Modeling Bush
I don't consider myself a particularly creative political mind. I like to hear about other people's opinions rather than create my own.
But I did have this mildly creative idea about the big health care bill. Maybe someone else has thought of it, I don't know.
Here it is:
Remember back-when to the Bush v. Kerry election? Remember how Bush is thought by some to have started the Iraq war when he did so as to guarantee a second term? I don't know enough to deny or support whether or not that was his motivation. Obama's team knows their electoral history, no doubt and perhaps took a lesson from Bush on this one, because I think it worked for him. Most of the big health care benefits in the new bill won't take place until around 2014 and a lot of the stimulus money from the various bills will kick in over the next couple of years. So here's the pitch: these "time release" policies all kick in just before the 2012 election or right after it, in the case of health care. Just like Bush, Obama-Team can play the card that beats out most, even if the current climate surrounding your office is poor: "Elect the office that is bringing us out of the recession, not some new administration that will have to catch up to what is going on and probably mess things up again." I don't think using catastrophic events for political gain is an ethical thing to do though, because it is at the expense of others.
Just an idea. But no doubt one the powers that be then and now have at least thought of.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)